男人身体六个部位很脆弱皮肤癌直肠癌肝炎

Even these eight pillars are all the same height. If one pillar would be shorter than the rest, then the shorter pillar would be completely unnecessary.

百度 该团伙涉嫌骗取出口退税近2000万元，属数额特别巨大，或将面临严重的刑事处罚。

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia are considered fundamental to the Wikipedia project. No one pillar is taller or shorter than the other — it is critical that each pillar have the same importance for the good of the entire project.

If one pillar was less important than another, then we would just have the "four pillars of Wikipedia" — but there are five.

The Five Pillars

Here's a list of the five pillars of Wikipedia:

1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
4. Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility
5. Wikipedia has no firm rules

Imagine if editors only focused on four of those five. What would the community become? What would happen to the project?

1. If we stopped having Wikipedia be an encyclopedia, it might become more of a social media outlet or news source or even a free web hosting server. That is not the purpose of Wikipedia.
2. If we stopped writing from a neutral point of view, the articles would begin to contain opinions, or be used as a political tool. That would not make Wikipedia better.
3. If we no longer created free content, that would reduce global enthusiasm and weaken Wikipedia.
4. If we stop treating each other with respect and civility, we run the risk of driving away volunteers.
5. If we create and stick to firm rules, we become a machine rather than a collaborative process. That would not make Wikipedia better.

While it certainly is valid for an editor to focus on one pillar instead of another based on their enthusiasm and knowledge, editors should be careful to not sacrifice one column for any of the others. None of the pillars are mutually exclusive. We need them all. They are our five pillars.